tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14539885.post116561161669764133..comments2023-09-30T18:56:06.919+09:00Comments on The Closet Grandmaster: The future of chessUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14539885.post-1165750379943158722006-12-10T20:32:00.000+09:002006-12-10T20:32:00.000+09:00I agree with Tom. The computer only outplayed Kram...I agree with Tom. The computer only outplayed Kramnik in one game, the one played by Kramnik, and the computer shouldn't be allowed to use its openings and endgames database, just its processor.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14539885.post-1165711527747368872006-12-10T09:45:00.000+09:002006-12-10T09:45:00.000+09:00Kramnik might well have won the match though, imo....Kramnik might well have won the match though, imo. The blunder was a freak, the final game's opening choice a great big risk that didn't come off; but he had definite winning chances in several. He just didn't pull it off.<BR/><BR/>I think the computer should be handicapped in one specific way though. Isn't a computer's processor in some sense its 'thinking'-centre? Well, human's only have one of those - and so should computers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com